2008 Proposal Scoring

2008 WRP Research Proposals Survey Header Image

0 – proposal does not address this criterion.

Mid-range – proposal, for the most part, addresses the criterion but not completely.

Top range – proposal describes the criterion well.

Re-Edit Survey If you want to re-edit this survey later, provide a password: Or, if you previously entered a password, and want to access your information: Enter password to re-edit a survey
* = Required
Question	Response
* Name
* Affiliation
Colorado Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan Proposal
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
IDEAS in Action
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Train the Trainer: Master Gardeners Prevent Aquatic Invasive Plant Introductions through Community Education and Outreach
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Relationship Between Zebra Mussel Infestations and Cyanobacterial Production in Drinking Water Reservoirs: Implications for Drinking Water Quality
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Aquatic Invasive Species Outreach and Education
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Professional Awareness of Flowering Rush In the Headwaters of the Columbia River System
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Effects of Zebra Mussels on Invertebrate and Fish Abundance, and Growth of Age-0 Largemouth Bass: Five Years after Invasions
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Develop and Implement Invasive Mussel Educational/Regulatory Signage and Video; Curecanti National Recreation Area
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL
Creation of Species Identification Expert Database: For use in survey identification of native and invasive species
*Proposal Format.* Does the proposal follow the requested format? (Score 0-5)
*Issue and/or Problem.* Is the issue or problem clearly stated? Is the issue tied to the goal of the WRP and does it address a 2007-2008 funding priority as listed in the Call for Proposals? (Score 0-20)
*Objectives.* Are the objectives specific, realistic and measurable? Are the benefits clearly stated and do they relate to the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Methods or Activities.* Is the approach technically feasible? Is the scale of the project consistent with its objectives? Will the described approach help attain the objectives? (Score 0-20)
*Deliverables.* Are the deliverables described clearly? Is it clear how they will be presented or available to the desired audience? Are the deliverables applicable on a regional basis? (Score 0-20)
*Budget and Cost Justification.* Is the budget reasonable and adequate for the work proposed? Does the budget provide good value for the funds requested? Are there matching or in-kind donations? (Score 0-15)
TOTAL